Wow!
This has been a crazy week. I gave the summative assessment (the English III MSL) two weeks ago in hopes of closing the research and finishing my paper. Remember, I am a biology teacher, and not English. The english teacher had the English IV answer key for the English III MSL and did not have the correct key. This also means that the Exam that was given as a midterm also was not graded yet (Yikes! it had been 4 weeks ago!) so I felt that the data that was taken was valid as they did not have the 'correct' answers yet.
Finally, last Tuesday, I received the correct answer key for the English III exam and had the kids upload their answers again so they could compare the results of what they had made in January to the new score in April after the instruction of the close reading strategies.
Data analysis:
It is evident that the close reading strategies did assist in deepening student understanding of the content at hand, however the utility of the strategies correlates with text at hand. Visualize and connect was the most difficult to do with creative writing, but the easiest to usefully apply to informational text such as chemistry.
Students utilized the strategies correctly, they knew how to apply to different situations and did receive valuable understanding from it.
My follow up to this is to see if the levels of questions required of the students to respond to text would then determine the most effective strategy to use for the task at hand.
Saturday, April 27, 2013
Sunday, April 21, 2013
A Hiccup in the plan
I chose to complete my action research on close reading strategies to assist students with reading comprehension and hopefully higher achievement on their AP english and AP US history courses that they are enrolled in this semester.
The students have received instruction in marking the text to do the following with their comprehension: summarize, clarify, question, respond, visualize and connect. After the initial instruction of the strategies were complete, I gave them a reading and respond assignment with the instructions of "use what strategies you feel are most useful to you". They reflected, and in short order I discovered that they did not utilize visualize, connect and respond as much as I had hoped.
I wondered if it was the nature of the text, as these were English essays that I was using to assess. Maybe it would be easier to utilize science text? This is definitely the platform for the visualizing component. It makes learning science content so much easier if the words can be converted into images.
I decided to forgo the original plan of teaching the strategy 'rereading' for another attempt to answer this question with a different type of text.
I copied a chapter from the college level chemistry text and gave them two focuses to be reading for with the explicit instruction to use the strategies that were least used during the prior assessment.
The students utilized the strategies requested, and reflected on the responses. I have not evaluated the responses thoroughly as of yet.
The students have received instruction in marking the text to do the following with their comprehension: summarize, clarify, question, respond, visualize and connect. After the initial instruction of the strategies were complete, I gave them a reading and respond assignment with the instructions of "use what strategies you feel are most useful to you". They reflected, and in short order I discovered that they did not utilize visualize, connect and respond as much as I had hoped.
I wondered if it was the nature of the text, as these were English essays that I was using to assess. Maybe it would be easier to utilize science text? This is definitely the platform for the visualizing component. It makes learning science content so much easier if the words can be converted into images.
I decided to forgo the original plan of teaching the strategy 'rereading' for another attempt to answer this question with a different type of text.
I copied a chapter from the college level chemistry text and gave them two focuses to be reading for with the explicit instruction to use the strategies that were least used during the prior assessment.
The students utilized the strategies requested, and reflected on the responses. I have not evaluated the responses thoroughly as of yet.
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Shifting winds
I am collecting student data on every step of the journey in terms of the previous discussed questions in response to the new text annotation strategies. To determine if the strategies are being utilized judiciously, I had the students annotate a text using any strategy that seemed useful to them. This was done twice, and both times the data illustrated that there are some strategies that are being over-used, while others are underused. This led me to some questions regarding the nature of the underused strategies.
I have noticed that today four students refered to text when they were struggling over a connection between characters in two different stories. This is a huge shift for them, and I have not seen this type of growth from them before. They were pulling quotes to provide evidence for the claim they were making. I'm so proud of them!!
I am thinking I may need to spend a little more time marking the text strategies with the students and postpone rereading strategies. I will change up the text to see if they can utilize a larger variety of strategies to increase comprehension of the content.
- I am wondering if it is the nature of the text...as science informational text woud be better served if using visualizing and connect.
- I am also curious if it could be the nature of the response questions the students are asked to do after reading the text? It is known that the purpose in reading should drive how you respond to the text.
I have noticed that today four students refered to text when they were struggling over a connection between characters in two different stories. This is a huge shift for them, and I have not seen this type of growth from them before. They were pulling quotes to provide evidence for the claim they were making. I'm so proud of them!!
I am thinking I may need to spend a little more time marking the text strategies with the students and postpone rereading strategies. I will change up the text to see if they can utilize a larger variety of strategies to increase comprehension of the content.
Sunday, March 3, 2013
Beginning AR
My AR proposal needs a few tweaks such as formative assessments made along the way and how/what I plan on collecting as reflective questions for myself.
My students are learning a new strategy a day on a text that I pull from their AP English class. On one essay, they will complete 2 or 3 strategies over the course of a week, no more than one new strategy a day.
Upon practicing that strategy on the text, they write a reflective piece that contains the following responses:
1. Explain "Questioning" to a friend. How would you tell them to do this strategy?
2. Is the strategy Questioning used effectively in all paragraphs? When is this strategy best used?
3. Provide three examples from your reading today in which you used the Questioning strategy.
This formative assessment allows me to see if they understand the strategy, have found ways to best apply using this strategy (evaluation) and their best examples of this strategy in action.
If they are successful in applying this strategy, the only question then becomes if they actually use it on an assessment to have success in answering AP English multiple choice responses and/or essays on the reading. This will come at the end of the implementation phase to best assess effectiveness.
My reflections consist of implementation of the content themselves, and to see if there seems to be confusion on how I instructed them to write in the margins. Again, I am not a reading teacher by trade but I am trying to expand my abilities to help my students. I am trying not to assign so many strategies that none are executed correctly, and give time to practice the strategies before we move on.
Tomorrow, we will begin reviewing the strategies as needed and see how they judiciously decide to apply what they are learning.
My students are learning a new strategy a day on a text that I pull from their AP English class. On one essay, they will complete 2 or 3 strategies over the course of a week, no more than one new strategy a day.
Upon practicing that strategy on the text, they write a reflective piece that contains the following responses:
1. Explain "Questioning" to a friend. How would you tell them to do this strategy?
2. Is the strategy Questioning used effectively in all paragraphs? When is this strategy best used?
3. Provide three examples from your reading today in which you used the Questioning strategy.
This formative assessment allows me to see if they understand the strategy, have found ways to best apply using this strategy (evaluation) and their best examples of this strategy in action.
If they are successful in applying this strategy, the only question then becomes if they actually use it on an assessment to have success in answering AP English multiple choice responses and/or essays on the reading. This will come at the end of the implementation phase to best assess effectiveness.
My reflections consist of implementation of the content themselves, and to see if there seems to be confusion on how I instructed them to write in the margins. Again, I am not a reading teacher by trade but I am trying to expand my abilities to help my students. I am trying not to assign so many strategies that none are executed correctly, and give time to practice the strategies before we move on.
Tomorrow, we will begin reviewing the strategies as needed and see how they judiciously decide to apply what they are learning.
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Clarity on AR
Today I dug into all the research I have been collecting on Close/critical reading in the classroom. I am getting a little concerned that this is a process, and I may not be able to see marked improvements in student reading comprehension with the class time I have available for AVID instruction. I still have to teach the kids chemistry to prepare for the exam at the end. Hendricks asserts in chapter 5 that I should define the amount of time that will be devoted to the intervention in class. As a result of this statement, I will devote half a class period each day to model and teach the close reading strategies to the students.
According to best practices forwarded by the research I am consulting, I should select brief texts that allow for multiple readings; I may choose to support student reading in small groups if needed; I should allow for dialogue based on the text between students, so I plan to conduct a whole-group Paideia seminar on the text. In addition, the final piece is for them to have a writing/reflection piece at the end of the seminar.
As a pre-assessment for measuring success, I would ask the students to read the text as they normally would-to mark as they see fit. I will have them reflect on the knowledge gained as a result of reading the text in a passage.
According to the Hendricks text, I should create an intervention plan based on best practices reviewed in literature (p. 75). In light of this information, I am using the AVID critical reading text as the base of instruction and will pull student handouts/resources from this text.
Here is what my intervention plan might look like:
Reading instruction in the high school setting has historically been relegated to 'seek and find' teaching, mapping out the text structures such as headings and titles and basic information gathering. The ability to read complex text proficiently and independently is an expectation of the Common Core State Standards and also of the Advanced Placement curriculum in all subject areas (Brown & Kappas, 2012).Within the framework of an accelerated, rigorous curriculum, students must have the skills to cope with such advanced expectations. Research conducted by Brown and Kappas recommend the implementation of close reading strategies to bridge the gap between novice and experienced reader(2012). Brown and Kappas define close reading as:
...the act of reading and rereading text over multiple instructional lessons. Through text-based questions and discussion, students are guided to deeply analyze and appreciate key vocabulary and how the meaning is shaped by context; attention to form, tone and imagery; the significance of word choice and syntax; and the discovery of different levels of meaning as passages are read multiple times (Brown & Kappas, 2012 p. 5).
My concern all along has been that I am going to be overwhelmed with trying to take on too many strategies for such a small time frame for instruction. According to Souvigner and Mokhlegerami, reading strategy instruction decreases effectiveness when too many strategies are applied at one time. As a result of this research, I will restrict strategy application to rereading text and writing in the margins. If these strategies prove useful, then I may be able to add pausing to connect ideas within a text.
According to best practices forwarded by the research I am consulting, I should select brief texts that allow for multiple readings; I may choose to support student reading in small groups if needed; I should allow for dialogue based on the text between students, so I plan to conduct a whole-group Paideia seminar on the text. In addition, the final piece is for them to have a writing/reflection piece at the end of the seminar.
As a pre-assessment for measuring success, I would ask the students to read the text as they normally would-to mark as they see fit. I will have them reflect on the knowledge gained as a result of reading the text in a passage.
According to the Hendricks text, I should create an intervention plan based on best practices reviewed in literature (p. 75). In light of this information, I am using the AVID critical reading text as the base of instruction and will pull student handouts/resources from this text.
Here is what my intervention plan might look like:
Reading instruction in the high school setting has historically been relegated to 'seek and find' teaching, mapping out the text structures such as headings and titles and basic information gathering. The ability to read complex text proficiently and independently is an expectation of the Common Core State Standards and also of the Advanced Placement curriculum in all subject areas (Brown & Kappas, 2012).Within the framework of an accelerated, rigorous curriculum, students must have the skills to cope with such advanced expectations. Research conducted by Brown and Kappas recommend the implementation of close reading strategies to bridge the gap between novice and experienced reader(2012). Brown and Kappas define close reading as:
...the act of reading and rereading text over multiple instructional lessons. Through text-based questions and discussion, students are guided to deeply analyze and appreciate key vocabulary and how the meaning is shaped by context; attention to form, tone and imagery; the significance of word choice and syntax; and the discovery of different levels of meaning as passages are read multiple times (Brown & Kappas, 2012 p. 5).
My concern all along has been that I am going to be overwhelmed with trying to take on too many strategies for such a small time frame for instruction. According to Souvigner and Mokhlegerami, reading strategy instruction decreases effectiveness when too many strategies are applied at one time. As a result of this research, I will restrict strategy application to rereading text and writing in the margins. If these strategies prove useful, then I may be able to add pausing to connect ideas within a text.
Saturday, February 9, 2013
Critical Reading strategies
I have received a copy of AVID's critical reading strategies for expository texts from our middle school administration that sat in this AVID strand last summer. I am a huge proponent of AVID methodologies. They are researched based and AVID retains data on implementation success.
There are twelve strategies for critical reading:
1. Planning
2. Pre-reading
3. Learning and retaining academic vocabulary
4. Rereading
5. Marking the text
6. Pausing to connect ideas
7. Writing in the margins
8. Charting the text
9. Responding to a writing task
10. Summarizing
11. Sentence starters
12. Investigating writers's choice
I can easily see 1-8 go together to build deep reading strategies. I wonder, though, if 9-12 are application?
Just to reinforce that this is a learning stretch for me, I did not know that these strategies were among a category of reading strategies called rhetorical principles.
I will follow reading comprehension while implementing strategies 1-9, possibly using a piece of literature that they have already been exposed to and responded to in their AP English class. I can utilize these texts to see if their reading comprehension increased as a result of these strategies. I can also use a current literature selection in their AP class (one that they have not been exposed to before) and see if the strategies improved the ability to respond to questions asked of the text.
I also have access to several AP english prompts (provided by college board for practice purposes) to measure effectiveness. In addition, the final exam for these students from Honors English III (the class that pre-empts AP English) can be utilized to see if comprehension increased as a result of strategy application.
There are twelve strategies for critical reading:
1. Planning
2. Pre-reading
3. Learning and retaining academic vocabulary
4. Rereading
5. Marking the text
6. Pausing to connect ideas
7. Writing in the margins
8. Charting the text
9. Responding to a writing task
10. Summarizing
11. Sentence starters
12. Investigating writers's choice
I can easily see 1-8 go together to build deep reading strategies. I wonder, though, if 9-12 are application?
Just to reinforce that this is a learning stretch for me, I did not know that these strategies were among a category of reading strategies called rhetorical principles.
I will follow reading comprehension while implementing strategies 1-9, possibly using a piece of literature that they have already been exposed to and responded to in their AP English class. I can utilize these texts to see if their reading comprehension increased as a result of these strategies. I can also use a current literature selection in their AP class (one that they have not been exposed to before) and see if the strategies improved the ability to respond to questions asked of the text.
I also have access to several AP english prompts (provided by college board for practice purposes) to measure effectiveness. In addition, the final exam for these students from Honors English III (the class that pre-empts AP English) can be utilized to see if comprehension increased as a result of strategy application.
Monday, January 21, 2013
Cognitive coaching research?
I am simultaneously taking cognitive coaching at the same time that I am completing this class. I just had the idea to combine the two! I wonder if I can use the coaching with my mentee to also formulate the basis of my action research topic?
I haven't read all the articles on AR as of yet, so I wonder how different the process is from scientific research that I am familiar with?
My question would be:
How does cognitive coaching affect (effect? I'll have to look that up) student achievement?
Variable:
cognitive coaching
Controls:
Here is where it gets kind of sticky. Need to have a group of students that we have a base line before coaching and after. This won't happen because we just switched semesters and we have a whole new group of kids.
Same novice teacher
Same mentor
I wonder if we could use a baseline of data that was collected last semester (student achievement) from the same course that she is also teaching this year? Still, different students.
I'll have to read up on that while I'm getting my hair done today.
I haven't read all the articles on AR as of yet, so I wonder how different the process is from scientific research that I am familiar with?
My question would be:
How does cognitive coaching affect (effect? I'll have to look that up) student achievement?
Variable:
cognitive coaching
Controls:
Here is where it gets kind of sticky. Need to have a group of students that we have a base line before coaching and after. This won't happen because we just switched semesters and we have a whole new group of kids.
Same novice teacher
Same mentor
I wonder if we could use a baseline of data that was collected last semester (student achievement) from the same course that she is also teaching this year? Still, different students.
I'll have to read up on that while I'm getting my hair done today.
Saturday, January 19, 2013
Action Research, Anyone?
I am taking a graduate course to assist me in making decisions that will improve my practice and thus student learning. This course is appropriately entitled action research! I will be making changes to the structure of my class, collecting data, assessing the data/reflecting and making more changes, continuing the cycle.
I am looking at looking closely at helping my AVID kids improve their reading comprehension and their writing abilities (synthesis) to communicate what they understood. They are weak in grammar, sentence structure, subject-verb agreement and punctuation. If I can make any improvements on students' progress through the use of close reading strategies and then help them formulate complete responses to essay questions, then we have success.
I plan to research effective close reading strategies then provide a pre-assessment on their abilities to form a base line for each student. Implementation will occur in sections so we can learn how to do this (I have no idea!). I will collect data on my students by randomly pulling cornell notes or learning logs from my class and any other class that they have, looking for evidence of transference from direct instruction to application in their every day writing. I will first focus on reading comprehension (close reading) and then move on to strategies to assist in the synthesis of articulating what they have read when given a prompt.
I am looking at looking closely at helping my AVID kids improve their reading comprehension and their writing abilities (synthesis) to communicate what they understood. They are weak in grammar, sentence structure, subject-verb agreement and punctuation. If I can make any improvements on students' progress through the use of close reading strategies and then help them formulate complete responses to essay questions, then we have success.
I plan to research effective close reading strategies then provide a pre-assessment on their abilities to form a base line for each student. Implementation will occur in sections so we can learn how to do this (I have no idea!). I will collect data on my students by randomly pulling cornell notes or learning logs from my class and any other class that they have, looking for evidence of transference from direct instruction to application in their every day writing. I will first focus on reading comprehension (close reading) and then move on to strategies to assist in the synthesis of articulating what they have read when given a prompt.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)